Volume 8, Issue 5, October Issue - 2020, Pages:586-604 |
Authors: Achal Kant, Nihar Ranjan Chakraborty, Bikram Kishore Das |
Abstract: Non-basmati aromatic rice is very popular for its excellent grain quality with an inbuilt aroma. But these cultivars have been ignored in the mainstream industrial agriculture due to low yielder. It is a serious matter that most of these cultivars are fast disappearing from cultivation in the locality. Therefore, there is an urgent need to improve these cultivars. Mutation breeding is one of the options to improve/rectify of specific traits of these cultivars within a very short period without altering the in-built quality traits viz. aroma. The prime objectives of the experiment were to determine radiation effects and to estimate the optimal dose which was necessary for any mutagenesis-based breeding programme. Popular cultivars namely Badshabhog, Bahadurbhog and Blackjoha were taken for gamma irradiation ranging from 200Gy to 400Gy with an interval of 50Gy and unexposed treatment used as control. The experiment was designed at in vitro and in vivo condition in a randomized block design with three replications. Data were analyzed through Duncan’s test and regression analysis. Most of the traits of each cultivar were exhibited a drastic reduction with increasing doses of gamma rays. The optimal dose of gamma rays based on the weighted mean of LD50 and GR30/GR50 with 40% and 10% weighted, respectively under in vitro and in vivo conditions were estimated at 358.37Gy & 346.10Gy in Badshabhog; 331.19Gy & 319.17Gy in Bahadurbhog; 314.55Gy & 314.05Gy in Blackjoha. This optimum dose of gamma rays can be used for obtaining desirable mutants of these cultivars with minimal damages. Blackjoha had the highest radio-sensitivity while Badshabhog showed relatively tolerant. |
[Download PDF] |
Full Text: 1 Introduction Aromatic rice is a small and special group of rice which is known for its fragrance and best in quality. It is more popular or demandable in Middle-East, European counties, and the United States. The dominant aromatic rice in world trade is ‘Basmati’ which grown in north-western India e.g. Punjab, Haryana, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi, Western U.P., and Pakistan (Hameed et al., 2020). Basmati rice production is not satisfactory in eastern India like West Bengal, eastern U.P., Jharkhand and Odisha due to non- retention of its original aroma, difficulty in milling because of very poor head rice recovery and also high susceptibility to insects-pests (Chakraborty & Kole, 2014). However, some aromatic landraces such as Badshabhog, Gobindabhog, Blackjoha, Bahadurbhog, Radhunipagol, Seetabhog, Tulaipanja etc., are very popular in eastern India due to its excellent grain quality, aroma and specific cooking quality features but they are not recognized as ‘Basmati’ rice due to their small to medium grain size (Chakraborty & Kole, 2014). These cultivars have some undesirable traits such as lodging susceptibility due to higher plant height (156-174 cm.) along with the less sturdy stem, high maturity duration (150-178 days) and blast susceptibility in the fluctuating environment caused yield reduction (Chakravarti et al., 2012). Therefore, there is an urgent need to improve the yield potential of such types of non-basmati aromatic rice without disrupting its original grain quality and cooking quality features. Genetic improvement in specific traits like the height of the plant, duration of maturity, yield and its component characters through hybridization and recombination often becomes difficult due to break-down of aroma and cooking quality characters. Mutation breeding is one of the options to improve/rectify specific traits of these cultivars within a very short period without break-down of in-built quality traits. Mutation induction offers for generating genetic variability, which may allow to identification of new desired attributes that either cannot be found in nature or have been lost during evolution (Oladosu et al., 2016). The most important aspects of mutation breeding have been the induction of polygenic mutation which can increase yield as well as other important agronomic characters (Abdelnour-Esquivel et al., 2020; Mamun et al., 2020). Globally, the 3,329 crop mutant cultivars including 513 mutant rice varieties obtaining by gamma irradiation were officially registered in FAO/IAEA mutant variety database (MVD, 2020). Since the 1960s, gamma rays have been most frequently used by the breeders in plant mutation breeding programme. Because gamma rays are considered as the most penetrating electromagnetic radiation and its operation is simpler from the other physical mutagens (Kovacs & Keresztesa, 2002; Li et al., 2019). Generally, Radio-sensitivity of the crops is varied and depending on the species, the varieties, plant part of the mutation and the water content of the material (Spencer-Lopes et al., 2018). Free radicals, can modify or damage important components of plant cells, are produced on the interaction with molecules in the plant cells, particularly water (Gowthami et al., 2017). One group of researchers agrees that the maximum probability to generate effective mutations founds at a dose where 50% of the irradiated individuals die (Ángeles-Espino et al., 2013). While other scientists have pointed out that another dose with the highest probability of producing beneficial mutations, abreast of LD50, is where 30% or 50% of a growth reduction (GR30/GR50) finds (Khalil et al., 2014). The optimal radiation dose for crop improvement programs is determined by using the LD50 and the GR30/GR50 to induce effective mutations with minimal impact on the genome, while with high doses, the genome may bear multiple impacts that regularly produce aberrations or negative changes(Thole et al., 2012). Furthermore, low irradiation doses may induce cell division and enzymatic activity or increase the number of photosynthetic pigments (Aparna et al., 2013), whereas, high irradiation doses may hamper enzyme and hormonal activities that may cause physical damage to the organelles or chemical changes in the cells (Alvarez-Holguin et al., 2019). These types of response were not related to genetic modifications, they will not acquire. In this perception, low and high irradiation doses may cause plant phenotypic changes that may be misguided for genetic changes (Alvarez-Holguin et al., 2019). Therefore, the optimal radiation dose must be determined before starting a mutagenesis-based genetic improvement programme; this will increase the possibility of finding effective mutations that help to avoid excessive losses in terms of time, cost of manpower, field area and experimental materials. The present investigation was undertaken to conduct a gamma rays sensitivity test for biological and quantitative traits and determination of optimal radiation dose in non-basmati aromatic rice Badshabhog, Bahadurbhog, and Blackjoha. 2 Materials and Methods 2.1 Plant materials and mutagen treatment Three non-basmati aromatic cultivars of rice namely Badshabhog (whitish creamy, short-medium cylinder seeds, maturity 150-160days), Bahadurbhog (brownish, short cylinder grain, maturity 155-165 days), Blackjoha (blackish, medium cylinder grain with an awn, maturity 140-150 days) were collected from Rice Research Station Chinsurah, Hooghly, West Bengal, India for radiation treatment. Genetically uniform, disease free, healthy seeds with 12 percent moisture of three cultivars each weighing 100g were taken in six packets for the experiment. Five such packets of each cultivar were used for gamma irradiations. The seeds were placed inside the gamma radiation chamber to get the seeds irradiated with five different doses of gamma rays viz. 200Gy, 250Gy, 300Gy, 350Gy, and 400Gy from the Cobalt 60 gamma rays source for the appropriate time for each dose based on the half-life of the source at BARC, Trombay, Mumbai in India. The dose rate was of the order of 17Gy/min in the radiation chamber. Sixth unexposed seed packet was used as control. 2.2 Experimental design, Growing plants, Data collection, and Statistical analysis The experiments were carried out at the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding (in vitro experiment) and Agriculture farm (in vivo experiment) of Palli Shikha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan, West Bengal, India. Both experiments were organized in a completely randomized block design with three replications. Under in vitro condition, 50 irradiated seeds (Spencer-Lopes et al., 2018) of each dose of three cultivars along with their control were grown on vertically stand blotting papers. Another experiment was carried out under in vivo conditions. The remaining seeds of each dose with their control were sown in raised nursery beds in the field at the same time. All necessary nursery practices were applied from time to time. Twenty-five days old seedlings of all three cultivars of each dose along with control were transplanted into the main field by adopting intra-row spacing of 15cm with a single seedling per hill and 20cm row to row spacing in completely randomized block design with three replications. The recommended dose of N P K fertilizer and standard cultural practices were carried out for better crop growth. The number of germinated seeds when both plumule and radicle were fully emerged counted for a period at 7th DAS (days after sowing) under both in vitro and in vivo condition (Lalitha et al., 2019) and expressed in percentage. Shoot length and root length were measured at 14th DAS when the first true leaves in control seedlings of each cultivar have been stopped growing as well as the second leaf just to initiate. The measurement was taken on randomly selected seedling in centimeters from the root-shoot junction (under in vitro) or soil level (under in vivo) up to the tip of the first leaf for the shoot. Seedling height (cm) under in vivo was taken on randomly selected seedlings (completed three leaves stage) in centimeters at 25th DAS (just before transplanting into the main field). Seedling survival percent as counted at 14th and 25th DAS (just before transplanting into the main field) under both in vitro and in vivo condition respectively and expressed in percentage. Data on various quantitative traits were also recorded on ten randomly selected plants in the main field. Data were subjected to the standard analysis both in vitro and in vivo conditions and determination of LD50 as well as GR30/GR50 doses of gamma rays using Microsoft excel 2016. The comparison between treatment means was tested for biological and quantitative traits with Duncan’s test (Duncan, 1955) by using IBM SPSS Statistics 25. Determination of the lethal dose (LD50) of gamma rays for germination of seeds and seedling survival under in vitro as well as in vivo conditions was carried out through Probit analysis (Finney, 1971; Gowthami et al., 2017). Probit mortality values for each genotype were plotted on the y-axis in a graph against to the Log10 doses on the x-axis through linear regression line by fitting linear regression equation, y=mx+c (where y is response variable, x is the irradiated Log dose) was used to estimate the Log10 dose associated with a probit of 5. Antilog of the Log10 value corresponding to the probit 5 was taken to find out the LD50 value of gamma rays for the particular trait under study. Percentage over control {(Mean of irradiated treatment/mean of control treatment) × 100} and percentage reduction (100- percentage over control)(Spencer-Lopes et al., 2018) were applied to determine the percent growth reduction (% GR) of the seedling growth parameters to gamma rays. Straight line equation y=mx+c (where y is percentage reduction values, x is the irradiated dose) were used to estimate the GR30 and GR50 dose of gamma rays associated with 30% and 50% growth reduction, respectively in traits under study. Under in vitro condition, a weighted mean for each cultivar was calculated based on the results of the LD50 obtained for germination (%) and seedling survival (%); GR30 and GR50 were obtained from shoot length and root length, respectively. Whereas under in vivo condition, a weighted mean for each cultivar was estimated based on the results of LD50 obtained for germination (%) and seedling survival (%); GR30 obtained for shoot length and seedling height. The LD50 was weighted with 40% for germination (%) and seedling survival (%), and the GR30/GR50, with 10% for remaining traits (shoot length, root length, and seedling height). The germination (%) and seedling survival (%) were the variables to which the highest weighting (40% for each) was assigned because the death of the individual indicates the highest damage that gamma radiation can produce. A single value under in vitro and in vivo condition was thus obtained, whereby the optimal radiation dose of gamma radiation for inducing mutagenesis in Badshabhog, Bahadurbhog, and Blackjoharice were established. 3 Results 3.1 Effects of gamma rays on various growth traits Table 1 showed significant differences at the 0.01 level of probability due to gamma irradiation in all three cultivars on various growth traits. Under in vitro and in vivo conditions at the period of 7th DAS, germination percentage decreased drastically in all three cultivars with increase gamma doses. All treatments mean were exhibited a linear trend as per Duncan’s test, except irradiation at 250Gy & 300Gy under both conditions in Badshabhog @ 350Gy& 400Gy under in vivo condition in Bahadurbhog and Blackjoha where the response was statistically at par. Shoot length under in vitro and in vivo condition and root length under in vivo condition of all three cultivars at 14th DAS were reduced significantly at a higher dose of gamma rays. While under in vivo condition, the response of gamma irradiation for shoot length at 250Gy & 300Gy in Bahadurbhog and 200Gy & 250Gy and 300Gy & 350Gy in Blackjoha were exhibited statistically non-significant between each other (Figure 1). No significant differences could be found among 200Gy, 250Gy& 300Gy in Badshabhog as well as in Blackjoha and also 350Gy& 400Gy in all three germplasm for root length (Figure 1). |
Abdelnour-Esquivel A, Perez J, Rojas M, Vargas W, Gatica-Arias A (2020) Use of gamma radiation to induce mutations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and the selection of lines with tolerance to salinity and drought. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 56: 88-97. Akilan M, Anand G, Vanniarajan C, Subramanian E, Anandhi K (2019) Study on the impact of mutagenic treatment on pollen and spikelet fertility and its relationship in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 10: 525-534. Alvarez-Holguin A, Raul Morales-Nieto C, Hugo Avendano-Arrazate C, Corrales-Lerma R, Villarreal-Guerrero F, Santellano-Estrada E, Gomez-Simuta Y (2019). Mean lethal dose (LD50) and growth reduction (GR50) due to gamma radiation in Wilmanlovegrass (Eragrostis superba). Revista Mexicana De CienciasPecuarias10: 227-223. Ángeles-Espino A, Valencia-Botín AJ, Virgen-Calleros G, Ramírez-Serrano C, Paredes-Gutiérrez L, Hurtado-De la Pena S (2013) Lethal doses (LD50) determination using Co60 on Agave tequilana var. Azul vitroplantlets. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 36: 381-386. Aparna M, Chaturvedo A, Sreedhar M (2013) Impact of gamma rays on the seed germination and seedling parameters of groundnut (Arachis hypogaeaL.). Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences 4: 61-68. Chakraborty NR, Kole PC (2008) Biological effects of gamma rays on aromatic rice. Indian Journal of Crop Science 3: 55-58. Chakraborty NR, Kole PC (2014) Gamma ray induced early generation polygenic variability in medium grain aromatic non-basmati rice. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 1: 28-35. Chakravarti SK, Kumar H, Lal JP, Vishwakarma MK (2012) Induced mutation in traditional aromatic rice-frequency and spectrum of viable mutations and characterizations of economic values. The Bioscan 7:739-742. Chandrashekar KR (2014) Gamma sensitivity of forest plants of Western Ghats. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 132: 100-107. Cheema AA, Atta BM (2003) Radiosensitivity studies in basmati rice. Pakistan Journal of Botany 35: 197-207. Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1-42. Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis, University Press. Cambridge, UK. Gaul H (1977) Mutagen effects in the first generation after seed treatment. Manual on Mutation Breeding Technical Reports Series119: 87-98. Gordon SA (1957) The effects of ionizing radiation on plants: biochemical and physiological aspects. The Quarterly Review of Biology 32: 3-14. Gowthami R, Vanniarajan C, Souframanien J, Pillai MA (2017) Comparison of radiosensitivity of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties to gamma rays and electron beam in M1 generation. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 8: 732-741. Hallajian MT, Ebadi AA, Mohammadi M, Muminjanov H, Jamali SS, Aghamirzaei M (2014) Integration of Mutation and Conventional Breeding Approaches to Develop New Superior Drought-tolerant Plants in Rice (Oryza sativa). Annual Research & Review in Biology 4(7) 1173-1186. Hameed K, Sadia B, Habib M, ul Qamar Z, Awan FS (2020) Detection of genetic divergence among Putative Ethyl Methane Sulfonate Mutants of Super Basmati using Microsatellite Marker. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-34720/v1 Harding SS, Johnson SD, Taylor DR, Dixon CA, Turay MY (2012) Effect of gamma rays on seed germination, seedling height, survival percentage and tiller production in some rice varieties cultivated in Sierra Leone. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2: 247-255. Haris A, Abdullah B, Subaedah A, Jusoff K (2013) Gamma ray radiation mutant rice on local aged dwarf. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 15: 1160-1164. Jan S, Parween T, Siddiqi TO (2012) Anti-oxidant modulation in response to gamma radiation induced oxidative stress in developing seedlings of Psoralea corylifolia L. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity113:142-149. Joshi B, Gour BK (1974) Comparative study of low and high dose of x ray irradiation of barley seeds during germination and early growth. In Proceedings of the Symposium-use of radiation and radio isotopes in studies of plant productivity Pp. 187-199. Khah MA, Verma RC (2015) Assessment of the effects of gamma radiations on various morphological and agronomic traits of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) var. WH-147. European Journal of Experimental Biology 5: 6-11. Khalil SA, Zamir R, Ahmad N (2014) Effect of different propagation techniques and gamma irradiation on major steviol glycoside’s content in Stevia rebaudiana. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 24: 1743-1751. Khalil SK, Rehman S, Afridi K, Jan MT (1986) Damage induced by gamma radiation in morphological and chemical characteristics of barley. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 2: 45-52. Kleinhofs A, Sander C, Nilan RA, Konzak CF (1974) Azide mutagenicity-mechanism and nature of mutants produced. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 5:195-199. Kovacs E, Keresztes A (2002) Effect of gamma and UV-B/C radiation on plant cells. Micron 33: 199-210. Kumar G, Swati K (2017) Germination and cytological aspects of Dolichos lablab L. exposed to gamma irradiation. Chromosome Botany 12: 63-71. Kumar V, Vishwakarma G, Chauhan A, Shitre A, Das BK, Nair JP, Surendran P, Sparrow H, Gupta AK (2018) Use of Proton Beam as a Novel Tool for Mutations in Rice. BARC NEWSLETTER 366: 5-9. Lalitha R, Arunachalam P, Mothilal A, Senthil N, Hemalatha G, Vanniarajan C, Souframanien J (2019) Radiation effect on germination and seedling traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 10: 1038-1048. Li F, Shimizu A, Nishio T, Tsutsumi N, Kato H (2019) Comparison and Characterization of Mutations Induced by Gamma-Ray and Carbon-Ion Irradiation in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Using Whole-Genome Resequencing. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 9: 3743-3751. Mamun AN, Kabir MH, Azad AK, Azam MA, Islam MR, Jahan MT, Islam MM, Das P(2020) Development of Rice Mutant Variety with Higher Yield and Improved Agronomic Traits through Carbon Ion Beam Irradiation. In Mutation Breeding Project Forum for Nuclear Cooperation in Asia (FNCA) June 2020: 1-10. MVD (2020) Mutant variety database. Available on http://mvd.iaea.org/ accessed on 1 April 2020. Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Abdul Malek M, Rahim HA, Hussin G, Abdul Latif M, Kareem I (2014) Genetic variability and selection criteria in rice mutant lines as revealed by quantitative traits. The Scientific World Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/190531. Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Hussin G, Ramli A, Rahim HA (2016) Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: a review. Biotechnology & Biotechnology Equipment 30: 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2015.1087333. Olasupo FO, Ilori CO, Forster BP, Bado S (2016) Mutagenic effects of gamma radiation on eight accessions of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.). American Journal of Plant Sciences 7: 339-351. Oney-Birol S, Balkan A (2019) Detection of cytogenetic and genotoxic effects of gamma radiation on M-1 generation of three varieties of Triticum aestivum L. Pakistan Journal of Botany 51: 887-894. Purwanto E, Nandariyah N, Yuwono SS, Yunindanova MB (2019) Induced Mutation for Genetic Improvement in Black Rice Using Gamma-Ray. AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science 41: 213-220. Ramchander S, Ushakumari R, Pillai MA (2015) Lethal dose fixation and sensitivity of rice varieties to gamma radiation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 49: 24-31. Rani MH, Kamruzzamana M, Ghanimb AM, Azada MA, Aktera MB (2016) Comparative effect of gamma and X-ray irradiations on some characters of rice seedlings of Ashfal and Binadhan-14. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research8:739-745. Riley Jr EF (1953) The effects of x-rays upon the growth of Avena seedlings. Abstract No. 48. Radiation Research Society, Iowa City, June: 22-24. Rutger JN (1992) Impact of mutation breeding in rice- A review. Mutation Breeding Review 8: 1-24. Sarawgi AK, Soni DK (1993) Induced genetic variability in M1 and M2 population of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Advances in Plant Science 6: 24-33. Sasikala R, Kalaiyarasi R (2010) Sensitivity of rice varieties to gamma irradiation. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1: 845-889. Spencer-Lopes MM, Forster BP, Jankuloski L (2018) Manual on mutation breeding (No. Ed. 3). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Thole V, Peraldi A, Worland B, Nicholson P, Doonan JH, Vain P (2012) T-DNA mutagenesis in Brachypodiumdistachyon. Journal of Experimental Botany 63: 567-576. Ussuf KK, Nair PM (1974) Effect of gamma irradiation on the indole acetic acid synthesizing system and its significance in sprout inhibition of potatoes. Radiation Botany 14: 251-256. Vasline AY (2013) An investigation on induced mutations in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Archives 13: 555-557. Wijesena KAK, Nawarathne NMA, Basnayake BMMP (2019) Effect of gamma irradiation on seed germination and plant growth parameters of three rice varietiescultivated in Sri Lanka. Journal of Agriculture and Value Addition 2: 79-84. Yasmine F, Ullah MA, Ahmad F, Rahman MA, Harun AR (2019) Effects of chronic gamma irradiation on three rice varieties. Journal Sains Nuclear Malaysia 31: 1-10.
|