An International Open Access Journal
News Scroll
E-mail Alerts
Subscribe for TOC Alerts
Search Articles
sidebar
Creative Commons License

Full Text


org

Volume 8, Issue 2, April Issue - 2020, Pages:134-139


Authors: Rakesh Sil Sarma, Pravin Prakash, Savita Jangde
Abstract: The present study was conducted to assess the effect of different arsenic concentrations on various germination and growth parameters of wheat. For this, wheat seeds  of variety HUW-234 were expose with five arsenic (AsV) concentrations viz., 50 µM, 100 µM, 150 µM, 200 µM and 250 µM, while treatment without AsV considered as control (AsV 0). Various growth parameters such as germination percentage, germination index, shoot length, root length, seedling vigour index, dry matter has been recorded at 3 days of germination. Results of study revealed that the germination percentage, germination index, Shoot length, root length, dry matter and SVI significantly reduced at the increasing the arsenic (AsV) concentrations. Results of study suggested that arsenic have harmful effects on seed germination and establishment in wheat crops which restricts plant growth and development.
[Download PDF]
Full Text: 1 Introduction Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the significant crops, grown as second most important staple food crop of the world. Wheat accounting nearly 30% of global cereal production and covers an area of 218.5 million hectares with an average productivity of 3.26 tonnes ha-1 (FAOSTAT, 2019). In Indian, wheat production stood at record 99.70 million tonnes in 2017-18 cropping year while it crossed 100 million tonnes in the year 2018-19 (Ministry of agriculture, and farmer welfare, 2018-19). Among major wheat growing countries, China (134.34 million tonnes) ranked first in the wheat production, followed by India (98.51 milliontonnes), Russia (85.86 milliontonnes), and the United States (47.37 million tonnes) (FAOSTAT, 2019). In India, Uttar Pradesh ranked first in wheat production and productivity. The state produces up to 300.01 lakh tonnes of wheat followed by Punjab (164.72 lakh tonnes), Haryana (116.30 lakh tonnes), Madhya Pradesh (76.27 lakh tonnes), and Rajasthan (72.14 lakh tonnes) (Ministry of agriculture and farmer welfare 2018-19). World Bank estimates the demand for wheat in developing countries will increase 60% by 2050. (FAOSTAT, 2019).  Wheat growers around the world need to increase their productivity for betterment of upcoming food demand and overwhelming increasing global populations. More than 200 types of minerals was reported in the Earth’s crust, it’s  maximum percentage (60%) are found in the form of arsenate, 20% are in the form of sulphides and rest 20% are mainly found at  the  form of  arsenides, sodium silicates, metal oxides (Onishi.1969).  Arsenic mainly  exist in several oxidation states such as As(-III), As(0), As(III), or As(V)  (Panda  et al.,2010). Plants can uptake arsenic mainly in inorganic form with the help of several transporter proteins (Neidhardt et al., 2015). The  principle driving force for arsenic uptake in plant roots is a concentration gradient between source and sink. According to Lei et al. (2012) that As (V) uses various Pi channels for its entry into the plant root cell. Arsenic contaminations disturb physio-chemical properties of soils and leads to severe loss of crop yields (Rahman et al., 2007). Arsenic exists in the environment in two forms mainly inorganic and organic, with arsenate [As(V)] and arsenite [As(III)] being the most prevalent inorganic and most toxic forms of arsenic (Duxbury et al., 2003). Arsenate being a phosphate analogy interferes with phosphate metabolism (phosphorylation and ATP synthesis) in plants while As(III) binds to sulfhydryl groups of proteins affecting their structures and/or catalytic functions (Zhao et al., 2010). Several studies report that arsenic toxicities  in plants  increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that leads to membrane damage, leakage,  non-specific oxidation of proteins and membrane lipids and also causes DNA injury (Srivastava et al., 2011). The mechanism of As(III)  allows As(III) to act as a cross-linking agent by binding up to three monothiol molecules, and disbalance functions of  GSH and alternatively destroyed several antioxidant systems like SOD, APX, Glutathione, GPX etc in plant metabolic system (Kitchin & Wallace, 2006). Inappropriate arsenic concentrations can be harmful to wheat seedling at early developmental stages. Seed germination and seedling growth were not much affected at low concentration but at higher concentrations it inhibit both seed germination and seedling growth (5-20 mg/kg soil). Physiological and biochemical activities of wheat seedlings were also changed under arsenic stress. Seed germination, biomass, root length and shoot height decreased, and as accumulation increased on early seedlings of several wheat varieties as concentrations increased (Liu et al., 2005). Wheat growers around the world need to increase their productivity, while the prices of wheat and other cereal grains decrease. In addition, with the expectation that prices for fertilizers and chemicals will continue to rise in the future, wheat producers must substantially improve their production efficiency to stay competitive. Arsenic in wheat grains was mainly found as inorganic form. Inorganic arsenic, a class I carcinogen, is more toxicant than other metalloids. So, it will result in health risk for wheat consumers. So understanding the mechanisms of arsenic metabolism in wheat is essential to fulfil the demand of future growing populations. Current study was conducted to access the effect of arsenic concentration on seed germination and seedling growth. 2 Materials and Methods In the present study, 6 different concentrations of arsenic (AsV) viz., 0, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 µM  was used to access the effect of As on wheat seed germination and seedling growth.  Each treatment contained 5 healthy and uniform sized seed in each petriplates. In experiment, three petri plates per combination will be arranged in randomized block design and experiments were repeated three times in a BOD chamber. Data were recorded each after 3 days intervals of experimental setup.  Thereafter, germination percentage, germination index, shoot length, root length, dry matter and seedling vigour index was observed and  analyzed. 2.1 Germination percentage (%) Numbers of germinated seeds were recorded after 48 hours of seed germination. Germination percentage was calculated as per the Association of official seed analysis (1983). Germination percentage = (No of seed germinated/ total number of seed sown) × 100. 2.2 Germination Index (GI): Germination index of wheat seed were calculated by the formula given by Ranal & Santana (2006). GI= (4×N1) + (3×N2) + · · · + Where N1, N2 ...N4 is the number of germinated seeds on the first, second and subsequent days until 3rd day and the multipliers (e.g. 4, 3 ...etc.) are weights given to the days of the germination 2.3 Seedling vigor index (SVI): Seedling vigor index was measured in 7 day old seedlings and it was calculated by the formula given by Goodi, & sharifzadeh, (2006). SVI= germination % × Dry wt. of 7 days old seedling. 2.4 Root and shoot length The maximum root and shoot length was measured with the help of scale  at  3rd days of germinations. 2.5 Total dry matter Seedlings were excised and placed into a oven (NSW-142) at 105oC for 5 minutes, this was followed by 65oC till the getting constant weight. Dry weight is taken at electrical balance (ADGR-200) at 3 days. 3 Results and Discussion Germination percentage is the most important traits which revealed germination capacity of plant. The value of GI indicates both the germination percentage and germination speed. Likewise, shoot length represents the vertical growth of the plants, root length is the important seedling parameters indicates the better establishment of seedlings and dry matter measure the production photosynthates in relation to productivity. Whereas, SVI is the important parameter indicates the seedling establishment and growth. The observations recorded for GP, GI, shoot length, root length, dry matter and SVI under different concentrations of arsenate (AsV). )  has been represented in   figure 1-4. Presented data showed that the germination percentage, GI, Shoot length, root length, dry matter and SVI significantly decreased as compared to control  (no AsV) with the increasing concentration of arsenic (50, 100, 150, 200 µM, 250µM). The highest germination percentage (84.3%), germination index (487.3), SVI (810.6), shoot length (5.27 cm), root length (4.02 cm) and dry matter (0.126g) were recorded in control, whereas, the least germination percentage (32.6%) germination index (251.7), SVI (372.3), shoot length (2.40 cm), root length (2.02 cm) and dry matter (0.041 g) were recorded in highest concentration of arsenic (250 µM). Results of study revealed that comparatively higher concentrations of arsenic have higher toxicities, it might be because of arsenic entry in to plants cells which can destroys thiol (SH) groups of enzymes that inhibits biochemical pathways of cells and disturb physiological activities (Abbas et al., 2018). In Brassica juncea and Arabidopsis thaliana crops arsenic mainly present as AsIII in tissues which form complexes with thiol compounds such as glutathione (GSH) and phytochelatins (PCs) (Castillo-Michel et al., 2011). In another study when plants were exposed to arsenic, reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced which induces lipid peroxidation and causes plant wilting (Farooq et al., 2016). Similar study was found that, plant species cultivated on AsV contaminated sites can readily adapt to suppression of P trans-porters (Meharg & Hartley-Whitaker, 2002). Arsenic can severely inhibit plant growth by  arresting  cell division expansion and significant dry matter accumulation, as well as disturbing  plant reproductive capacit and reducing crop  production ( Garg & Singla, 2011). Further, it was observed that seedlings of Cicer arietinum (Malik et al., 2011) and Oryza sativa (Vromman et al., 2013) showed stunted growth of roots, shoots and also suppress the number of leaves, leaf area, and fresh and dry mass of plants (Nath et al., 2014). Conclusion In the presented study, effect of Arsenic (AsV) on wheat germination and seedling growth evaluated. The increasing concentration of arsenic has severe negative effects in terms of demodulate seed germination, overall roots, shoots and leaves length, and on the dry biomass. It was observed that concentrations of arsenic (AsV,250 µM) showed maximum decreasing  effects in all parameters. These findings showed that harmful effect of arsenic toxicities in   agricultural crops, and its effects on seed germination and overall yield in wheat  crops. Further research is required under both lab and field conditions, to use several remediation techniques for practical applications of agriculture for better crop productions. Conflict of Interest Authors would hereby like to declare that there is no conflict of interests that could possibly arise.
REFERENCES

Abbas G, Murtaza B, Bibi I, Shahid M, Niazi NK, Khan MI, Amjad M, Hussain M, Natasha (2018) Arsenic uptake, toxicity, detoxification, and  speciation in plants: physiological, biochemical and molecular aspects. International Journal of Environmental Research 15: 59-70.

Association of Official Seed Analysts (1983) Seed Vigor Testing Handbook. 1st Edition, AOSA, East Lasing, 88.

Castillo-Michel H, Hernandez-Viezcas J, Dokken KM, Marcus MA, Peralta- Videa JR,  Gardea-Torresdey JL (2011) Localization and speciation of arsenic in soil and desert plant Parkinsonia florida using mu XRF and mu XANES. Environment Science And Technology 45: 7848–7850.

Duxbury JM, Mayer AB, Lauren JG, Hassan N (2003) Food chain aspects of arsenic contamination in Bangladesh: Effects on quality and productivity of rice, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 38: 1–69.

FAOSTAT (2019) Part 3: Feeding the world. In: FAO Statistical Yearbook 2019: World Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, pp. 123–199. [Accessed January 04, 2019].

Farooq MA, Gill RA, Ali B, Wang J, Islam F, Ali S,   Zhou WJ  (2016) Subcellular distribution, modulation of antioxidant and stress-related genes response to arsenic in Brassica napus L.  Ecotoxicology 25: 350–366.

Garg N, Singla P (2011) Arsenic toxicity in crop plants: physiological effects and tolerance mechanisms. Environmental Chemistry Letter 9: 303–321.

Goodi M, Sharifzadeh F (2006) Evaluation effect of hydropriming in barley difference cultivars. Biaban Desert Journal 11: 99-109.

Kitchin KT, Wallace K (2006) Arsenite binding to synthetic peptides: The effect of increasing length between two cysteines. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology 20: 35–38.

Lei M, Wan XM,  Huang ZC, Chen TB, Li XW, Liu YR (2012) First evidence on different transportation modes of arsenic and phosphorus in arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata. Environmental  Pollution 161: 1–7.

Liu XM, Zhang FR,   Wang R,  Wang Y (2005) Effects of nano-ferric oxide on the growth and nutrients absorption of peanut. Plant Nutrition and Fertility Science 11: 14-18.

Malik JA, Goel S, Sandhir R, Nayyar H (2011) Uptake and distribution of arsenic in chickpea: Effects on seed yield and seed composition. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42: 1728–1738.

Meharg AA,  Hartley-Whitaker  J (2002) Arsenic uptake and metabolism in arsenic resistant and nonresistant plant species. New Phytology 154: 29–43.

Ministry of agriculture and farmer welfare Report (2018-19) Government of India,Annual reports.

Nath S, Panda P, Mishra S, Dey M, Choudhury S, Sahoo L, Panda SK (2014) Arsenic stress in rice: Redox consequences and regulation by iron. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 80: 203–210.

Neidhardt H, Kramar U, Tang X, Guo H, Norra S (2015) Arsenic accumulation in the roots of Helianthus annuus and Zea mays by irrigation with arsenic-rich groundwater: Insights from synchrotron X-ray fluorescence imaging. Geochemistry 75: 261–270.

Onishi H (1969) Arsenic. In Wedepohl KH (Ed.) Handbook of Geochemistry; Springer: Berlin, Germany,

 Panda S, Upadhyay R, Nath S (2010) Arsenic stress in plants. Journal of  Agronomy Crop Sciences 196: 161–174.

Rahman MA, Hasegawa H, Rahman MM, Miah MAM, Tasmin A (2007) Arsenic accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Human exposure through food chain. Ecotoxicology and Environmental safety 69: 317–324.

Ranal MA, Santana DG (2006) How and why to measure the germination process? Brazil journal of Botany 29: 1-11.

Srivastava S, Suprasanna P, D’Souza SF (2011) Redox state and energetic equilibrium determine the magnitude of stress in Hydrilla verticillata upon exposure to arsenate. Protoplasma 48:805–815.

Vromman D, Lutts S, Lefèvre I, Somer L, De Vreese O, Šlejkovec Z, Quinet M (2013) Effects of simultaneous arsenic and iron toxicities on rice (Oryza sativa L.) development, yield-related parameters and As and Fe accumulation in relation to As speciation in the grains. Plant and Soil 371: 199–217.

Zhao FJ, McGrath SP, Meharg AA (2010) Arsenic as a food chain contaminant:   mechanisms of plant uptake and metabolism and mitigation strategies. Plant Biology 61:535–559.

 

Editorial Board
Indexed & Listed In
Scimago Journal Rank
Track manuscript
Manuscript Statistics
Articles Statistics
Publication Statistics